Search for: All records

Cobalt telluride anchored to nitrogen-rich carbon dodecahedra (CoTe@NCD) was synthesized by simultaneous pyrolysis-tellurium melt impregnation of ZIF-67 MOFs. The purely thermal method involved no secondary chemicals and no waste byproducts. The result is a microstructure consisting of nanoscale 86 wt% CoTe intermetallic nanoparticles contained within a thin N-rich carbon matrix. During electrochemical cycling, the 21 nm average diameter CoTe provides short diffusion paths for Na + /K + ions, which in conjunction with the electrically conducting carbon matrix allow for rapid potassiation or sodiation. As potassium ion battery (PIB and KIB) and sodium ion battery (NIB and SIB) anodes, CoTe@NCD demonstrates attractive reversible capacity, promising cycling stability, and state-of-the-art rate performance. For example, as a KIB anode, the CoTe@NCD electrode exhibits a reversible capacity of 380 mA h g −1 at 50 mA g −1 and a fast charge capacity of 136 mA h g −1 at 1000 mA g −1 . As a NIB anode, it also displays excellent rate capability achieving 620 mA h g −1 at 50 mA g −1 and 345 mA h g −1 at 1000 mA g −1 . 

A new concentrated ternary salt ether‐based electrolyte enables stable cycling of lithium metal battery (LMB) cells with high‐mass‐loading (13.8 mg cm⁻², 2.5 mAh cm⁻²) NMC622 (LiNi_0.6Co_0.2Mn_0.2O₂) cathodes and 50 μm Li anodes. Termed “CETHER‐3,” this electrolyte is based on LiTFSI, LiDFOB, and LiBF₄with 5 vol% fluorinated ethylene carbonate in 1,2‐dimethoxyethane. Commercial carbonate and state‐of‐the‐art binary salt ether electrolytes were also tested as baselines. With CETHER‐3, the electrochemical performance of the full‐cell battery is among the most favorably reported in terms of high‐voltage cycling stability. For example, LiNi_xMn_yCo_1–x–yO₂(NMC)‐Li metal cells retain 80% capacity at 430 cycles with a 4.4 V cut‐off and 83% capacity at 100 cycles with a 4.5 V cut‐off (charge at C/5, discharge at C/2). According to simulation by density functional theory and molecular dynamics, this favorable performance is an outcome of enhanced coordination between Li⁺and the solvent/salt molecules. Combining advanced microscopy (high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy) and surface science (X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy, time‐of‐fight secondary ion mass spectroscopy, Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy), it is demonstrated that a thinner and more stable cathode electrolyte interphase (CEI) and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) are formed. The CEI is rich in lithium sulfide (Li₂SO₃), while the SEI is rich in Li₃N and LiF. During cycling, the CEI/SEI suppresses both the deleterious transformation of the cathode R‐3m layered near‐surface structure into disordered rock salt and the growth of lithium metal dendrites.

 

The interrelation is explored between external pressure (0.1, 1, and 10 MPa), solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) structure/morphology, and lithium metal plating/stripping behavior. To simulate anode‐free lithium metal batteries (AF‐LMBs) analysis is performed on “empty” Cu current collectors in standard carbonate electrolyte. Lower pressure promotes organic‐rich SEI and macroscopically heterogeneous, filament‐like Li electrodeposits interspersed with pores. Higher pressure promotes inorganic F‐rich SEI with more uniform and denser Li film. A “seeding layer” of lithiated pristine graphene (pG@Cu) favors an anion‐derived F‐rich SEI and promotes uniform metal electrodeposition, enabling extended electrochemical stability at a lower pressure. State‐of‐the‐art electrochemical performance is achieved at 1MPa: pG‐enabled half‐cell is stable after 300 h (50 cycles) at 1 mA cm⁻²rate −3 mAh cm⁻²capacity (17.5 µm plated/stripped), with cycling Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.8%. AF‐LMB cells with high mass loading NMC622 cathode (21 mg cm⁻²) undergo 200 cycles with a CE of 99.4% at C/5‐charge and C/2‐discharge (1C = 178 mAh g⁻¹). Density functional theory (DFT) highlights the differences in the adsorption energy of solvated‐Li⁺onto various crystal planes of Cu (100), (110), and (111), versus lithiated/delithiated (0001) graphene, giving insight regarding the role of support surface energetics in promoting SEI heterogeneity.

 

Lithium metal–selenium (Li–Se) batteries offer high volumetric energy but are limited in their cycling life and fast charge characteristics. Here a facile approach is demonstrated to synthesize hierarchically porous hollow carbon spheres that host Se (Se@HHCS) and allow for state-of-the-art electrochemical performance in a standard carbonate electrolyte (1 M LiPF 6 in 1 : 1 EC : DEC). The Se@HHCS electrodes display among the most favorable fast charge and cycling behavior reported. For example, they deliver specific capacities of 442 and 357 mA h g −1 after 1500 and 2000 cycles at 5C and 10C, respectively. At 2C, Se@HHCS delivers 558 mA h g −1 after 500 cycles, with cycling coulombic efficiency of 99.9%. Post-mortem microstructural analysis indicates that the structures remain intact during extended cycling. Per GITT analysis, Se@HHCS possesses significantly higher diffusion coefficients in both lithiation and delithiation processes as compared to the baseline. The superior performance of Se@HHCS is directly linked to its macroscopic and nanoscale pore structure: the hollow carbon sphere morphology as well as the remnant open nanoporosity accommodates the 69% volume expansion of the Li to Li 2 Se transformation, with the nanopores also providing a complementary fast ion diffusion path. 

We present comprehensive first-principles density functional theory (DFT) analyses of the interfacial strength and bonding mechanisms between crystalline and amorphous selenium (Se) with graphene (Gr), a promising duo for energy storage applications. Comparative interface analyses are presented on amorphous silicon (Si) with graphene and crystalline Se with a conventional aluminum (Al) current collector. The interface strengths of monoclinic Se (0.43 J m–2) and amorphous Si with graphene (0.41 J m–2) are similar in magnitude. While both materials (c-Se, a-Si) are bonded loosely by van der Waals (vdW) forces over graphene, interfacial electron exchange is higher for a-Si/graphene. This is further elaborated by comparing the potential energy step and charge transfer (Δq) across the graphene interfaces. The interface strength of c-Se on a 3D Al current collector is higher (0.99 J m–2), suggesting a stronger adhesion. Amorphous Se with graphene has comparable interface strength (0.34 J m–2), but electron exchange in this system is slightly distinct from monoclinic Se. The electronic characteristics and bonding mechanisms are different for monoclinic and amorphous Se with graphene as they activate graphene via surface charge doping divergently. The implications of these interfacial physicochemical attributes on electrode performance have been discussed. Our findings highlight the complex electrochemical phenomena in Se interfaced with graphene, which may profoundly differ from their “free” counterparts.